 |
Commentary
by Julia-Dudnik Ptasznik:
 |
“Citizen
X” (1995) Director:
Chris Gerolmo
Starring: Stephen Rea, Donald Sutherland,
Max Von Sydow, Jeffrey DeMunn
Rating:
(4.5 /5) |
Review: Andrei Chikatilo was the
worst serial killer in Russian history,
if not in the world. During 1982-1990, he
tortured, raped, mutilated, and ultimately
murdered at least 53 children and teenagers.
Robert Cullen's book, The Killer Department,
served as the basis for an HBO original
picture, "Citizen X," the story of the hunt
for Chikatilo.
"Citizen X" is not your typical made-for-cable
film; it could hold its own against any
major movie studio production. It has been
nominated for dozens of awards and won the
CableACE Award for Best Picture. The plot
may seem familiar to those that favor the
serial killer movie genre; however, the
familiarity is superficial. It is about
a relentless police investigator Burakov
(Rea, probably best known for his lead role
in the 1992 film "The Crying Game") who
pursues Chikatilo (DeMunn) with the help
of his supportive supervisor Fetisov, the
portrayal of whom has won Donald Sutherland
an Emmy and a Golden Globe Award.
While serial killers are not a new occurrence
in Western countries and most certainly
not a new topic for movies, this film is
highly unusual. Consider the fact that it
is set during the Soviet years, for the
entire duration of which there was no official
recognition of anything perceived as abnormal,
immoral, or simply contradictory to the
Communist Party policies. According to the
Russian government of the time, there was
no religion, no other political parties,
no prostitution, no homosexuality
and, of course, no serious crime. There
were no flaws in the system; since "all
crime happened in the West," investigations
were handled as far out of the public eye
as possible.
"Citizen X" does an excellent job of depicting
an investigation that had to take place
in this environment: Burakov's supervisors
did not recognize Chikatilo as a serial
killer, had refused the help of the FBI
or any other foreign agency, and consistently
turned down Burakov's requests for additional
manpower. As such, the hunt went on for
years, with Burakov being pretty much the
only person on the case. Most interesting
is how this movie compares to a typical
Western film of this genre. Here, there
is no gore, car chases, dramatic fights,
or scary villains. Chikatilo is actually
a pathologically disturbed, deeply unhappy
man who may even inspire sympathy in some
viewers. The film is engrossing and horrifying,
as Burakov is alone and helpless, totally
traumatized by his inability to stop an
almost decade-long killing spree and nearing
insanity himself as a result of exhaustion,
grief, and failure.
At the time of the movie's release, the
critics praised the performances of the
actors, but many commented on the drab appearance
of the film. Clearly, none of those critics
ever lived in Russia. The movie - or,
rather, the life it portrays - may
seem drab to those residing in the more
industrialized countries; however, I can
tell you from personal experience that "drab"
is a relative term. In fact, although filmed
in Hungary, "Citizen X" was highly accurate
in its depiction of the bureaucracy, red
tape, and general life under Communist rule.
The events portrayed in "Citizen X" had
global historic implications. This investigation
forever changed Russian police work and
procedure. In addition, "Citizen X" documented
one of the first occurrences - and
certainly the first in Russia - of
involving a psychiatrist (portrayed by Max
Von Sydow) in a criminal investigation,
which aided in the acceptance of behavioral
science as a stand-alone discipline and
as a tool in investigating crime.
The bottom line: The film is successful
on every level, from its highly original
plot, to superb realism, historical accuracy,
and strong performances. –J.D-P
|
|
 |
“Sweethearts”
(1996) Director:
Aleks Horvat
Starring: Janeane Garofalo, Mitch Rouse,
Margaret Cho, Bob Goldthwait
Rating:
(4.0/5) |
Review: Although I am not a big
fan of stand-up comedy as a genre (most
of it is a bit too contrived), I've admired
Janeane Garofalo for some time. There is
something very unusual and appealing about
her candor, sarcasm, and self-deprecating,
genuine delivery. She is not what you'd
call "mainstream." Garofalo has made numerous
cameo appearances in major blockbuster films,
stealing the scene every time no matter
how small the part. To date, her most critically
acclaimed film role has been a lead in "The
Truth About Cats and Dogs" (1996, co-starring
Uma Thurman), for which she won an MTV Movie
Award for Best Comedic Performance.
By accident, I stumbled across a news item
about what critics labeled Garofalo's "biggest
career mistake" - turning down the
part of Gail Weathers in "Scream" (1996,
taken by Courteney Cox) to do another project.
I found this out when "Scream 2" (1997)
was already in the works, and, given its
predecessor's success, was quite curious
what Garofalo's "other project" was. It
was "Sweethearts," a film co-written and
co-produced by Garofalo herself and director
Aleks Horvat, which unfortunately went straight
to video.
Biggest mistake? Hardly. This little-known
flick is one of the best movies I've ever
seen, and it truly shows Garofalo's mastery
as an actress. Unexpectedly, it is not a
comedy; even its ending isn't anywhere near
happy. Garofalo plays a manic-depressive
Jasmine who has reached the end of her rope
and is set on going out with a bang by killing
herself on the morning of her 31st birthday.
To make the occasion even more special,
she arranges for a blind date through a
personals ad on the night before the big
event.
Her unsuspecting date, Arliss (Rouse) shows
up at the designated pretentious coffee
house, to find that Jasmine doesn't even
come close to the description given in the
ad. But he is a nice guy, so he sticks around
long enough to discover that Jasmine is
a little "off." When Arliss attempts to
make a graceful exit, Jasmine makes him
reconsider - at gun point. Before
long, Arliss is head over heels, as unlikely
as the possibility of that happening may
have seemed in the beginning of the evening.
This dark and touching take on romance leaves
you speechless. If you know anything about
bipolar disorder, you'll recognize how authentic
and unconventional this film is. What's
more, it is brilliantly executed; there
is nothing unnecessary. no glamour, no excess
props, and barely any supporting actors
- it is simply two people placed
in a seemingly surreal, yet very realistic,
situation. If you can get your hands on
this one, grab it. –J.D-P
|
|
 |
“Demolition
Man” (1993) Director:
Marco Brambilla
Starring: Silvester Stallone, Wesley
Snipes, Sandra Bullock, Denis Leary
Rating:
(3.0/5)
|
Review: Despite what most critics
had to say, I enjoyed this flick. Most objections,
if memory serves, went along the lines of
"failing to create a realistic future environment"
something or other. Duh. To me, this totally
misses the point. Let's not pretend this
one is a "film." Although labeled as a sci-fi
adventure, "Demolition Man" is best described
as an action comedy, and those who like
Snipes, Stallone, and a good laugh are bound
to have a ball watching it.
In the words of the lead homicidal psychopath,
Simon Phoenix (Snipes), who has just broken
out of cryogenic jail, "The year is 2032,
and the world has become a . pussy-whipped
version of itself." Indeed, the setting
is a spin on America's obsession with political
correctness and health. All things that
are not good for you, including salt, coffee,
nicotine, spices, etc., have been made illegal.
Neat little wall fixtures buzz and dispense
tickets for use of profanity. Physical contact
has been outlawed as well, and sex has been
replaced by virtual reality gadgets to prevent
transmission of bodily fluids. There is
no crime, and the last murder dates back
to 2010. And the best part is, all restaurants
are now Taco Bell "after the franchise wars."
The list of these hilarious (but not overly
far-fetched) exaggerations is too long.
The plot is highly amusing as well. Phoenix's
escape from cryo-jail has been orchestrated
by the man in charge of this new and improved
world, with a goal of eliminating Edgar
Friendly (Denis Leary), the leader of the
"last remaining criminal element," a group
of non-conformists who live underground
in sewers and come up only to steal food.
To the authorities' dismay, Phoenix cannot
be controlled and wreaks havoc, putting
off his contract hit to partake in a fabulous
killing spree which begins with carving
an eye out of the cryo-jail warden's head.
Lenina Huxley (Bullock), a young police
lieutenant obsessed with the 20th century
and eager for some action, suggests "defrosting"
another prisoner to deal with Phoenix -
John Spartan (Stallone), a former LAPD
sergeant who initially captured Phoenix
and was wrongly imprisoned for crimes he
did not commit. (This is where you get to
see Sly in the buff, and six months of heavy-duty
training prior to filming of this movie
prove worthwhile.) Spartan and Huxley pursue
Phoenix who has already managed to thaw
out a few of his pals and is trying to do
the same with the rest of the cryo-jail
prisoners. In the process, they make friends
with Edgar Friendly and proceed to systematically
demolish the sterilized streets of what
is now called San Angeles.
"Demolition Man" is the directorial debut
of Marco Brambilla, a man who has been named
Canada's top advertising commercial director.
His advertising training is evident in this
production; the movie is sleek and polished;
the attention to detail is incredible, and
the editing is superb. However, actors'
performances range. Stallone's, for one,
is unremarkable - he's the good old
macho man placed in a new setting, which
is mildly funny in itself. It is also obvious
that he had a good time making the movie
and didn't take it too seriously. Bullock,
for whom this was the first major role,
is quite good; she gets to be cute (which
is what she does best), kick some butt Jackie
Chan-style, and spout bastardized versions
of 20th century slang, like "Let's blow
this guy" and "You licked his ass."
Snipes and Leary really make the movie.
Snipes, with his different colored eyes
and blond hair, is wildly maniacal. He delivers
his lines and his kicks with pizzazz, conviction,
and a marked level of crazed energy. Leary,
on the other hand, is his usual cynical,
sarcastic, yet charismatic self. His key
monologue goes something like, "I want to
run naked through the streets, covered in
green Jell-O and reading Playboy. Why? Because
I suddenly might have the urge to!"
Fine. If one attempts to dissect "Demolition
Man" on the level of a classic, it has faults.
But it's fun. Sometimes, that's just what
we need. –J.D-P
|
|
 |
“Gladiator”
(2000) Director:
Ridley Scott
Starring: Russell Crowe, Joaquin Phoenix,
Richard Harris, Connie Nielsen
Rating:
(2.5/5)
|
Review: The success of this movie
truly puzzles me. No, I am not referring
to its box office success - a production
like this one was bound to bring in huge
audiences. But the Academy Awards? I'm sorry;
I just don't get it.
But first things first. The plot is of "Gladiator"
is formulaic at best: Bad guy kills good
guy's loved ones. Good guy seeks revenge.
OK, here is a longer version: General Maximus
(Crowe), leads his legions to yet another
victory, concluding a war and bringing glory
to the Roman Empire. Immediately thereafter,
this "simple man" only wishes to return
home to his wife and son. However, the dying
Emperor Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris),
lacking confidence in his own son Commodus
(Phoenix), asks Maximus to assume power.
The royally pissed Commodus kills his own
father, orders the execution of Maximus
and his family, and appoints himself the
new Caesar. Maximus escapes, comes home
to find his house torched and his wife and
son dead, and passes out to wake up a slave.
He is trained as a gladiator; his fame grows,
eventually bringing him to Rome and giving
him the opportunity to avenge his family
by killing Commodus. Of course, this is
all accompanied by the classic elements
of a good melodrama, from political intrigue
to betrayal, long-lost-and-rekindled love,
blackmail, and incest.
"Gladiator" scored 12 Oscar nominations
and won five, including Best Picture, Best
Actor, Visual Effects, Sound, and Costume
Design. To give credit where credit is due,
the last three are duly warranted; this
was a visually breathtaking epic. Even the
Best Actor award is semi-justified, although
Joaquin Phoenix's performance was indisputably
stronger. Without his menacing, totally
captivating portrayal of the evil Commodus
(nominated for Best Supporting Actor), this
film wouldn't even be worth watching.
It is the Best Picture Oscar that troubles
me most, as "Gladiator" is not even in the
same league as "Chocolat," "Erin Brockovich,"
and "Traffic," also nominated in this category.
It is most certainly beatifully filmed and
expertly crafted, but hardly original in
concept or execution. Just compare it to
"Braveheart" (1995), which also won an Academy
Award for Best Picture. Both are similar
in their historical-heroic-epic-adventure-honor-glory
quality, down to the killing of a loved
one and seeking revenge, yet "Braveheart"
manages to capture the audience on an emotional,
gut-wrenching level. "Gladiator," on the
other hand, is a typical guy flick. It's
so obvious that it's hard to care whether
Maximus lives or dies in the end. But it
certainly isn't the worst way to pass a
Friday night. –J.D-P
|
|
 |
“What
Women Want”
(2000)
Director:
Nancy Meyers
Starring: Mel Gibson, Helen Hunt,
Marisa Tomei, Alan Alda
Rating:
(2.5/5) |
Review: Gentlemen, be very afraid.
After making you watch this one, your girlfriend
or wife will inevitably whine something
along the lines of, "Why can't you be more
like that?" Buy lots of beer.
Nancy Meyers, a master of the romantic comedy
genre ("Private Benjamin," "Irreconcilable
Differences," "Father of the Bride"), sticks
to her own with "What Women Want." Nick
Marshall (Gibson), an ad executive specializing
in the tits-and-ass variety, has a freak
accident which allows him to hear women's
thoughts. At the same time, he is passed
over for a promotion in favor of a woman,
Darcy McGuire (Hunt). Naturally, he attempts
to use his newfound powers to his advantage
and undermine his new boss, only to fall
in love with her and "truly understand what
women want."
The trouble is that this movie is not indicative
of what women want at all (or, perhaps,
I'm warped, which is a distinct possibility).
Darcy herself isn't that bad, but the majority
of the other thoughts to which Gibson's
character is now privy make women look totally
neurotic, suicidal/depressive, lonely, power-hungry,
nasty, or just plain stupid. (Yeah, I bet
many of you guys are mumbling under your
noses right about now.) Plus, the agency
they all work at doesn't seem to do any
real work; they all just lounge around,
with the exception of the hard-working Darcy.
Although an attempt at portraying the competitive
environment of the ad biz is made, it isn't
convincing. Then again, this is a comedy,
so a certain level of exaggeration is expected
and forgivable.
Gibson makes up for the movie's faults with
his trademark whack-job performance. The
witty script puts Nick in some truly idiotic
situations, like facing his estranged teenage
daughter (and her boyfriend) clad in women's
stockings, nail polish, and lipstick. As
always, he is infectuosly funny - probably
because he truly enjoys what he does. While
not earth-shattering, this light-hearted
comedy is easy to watch. Regrettably, it's
also easy to forget. –J.D-P
|
|
 |
“Unbreakable”
(2000) Director:
M. Night Shyamalan
Starring: Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson,
Robin Wright Penn
Rating:
(1.0/5)
|
"There is a sole survivor, and he is miraculously
unharmed." You'd think that a combination
of such an intriguing premise with powerhouse
actors and the writer/director who brought
us "The Sixth Sense" would make for a mind-blowing
thriller.
Yawn. Try mind-blowing boredom. I stuck
around for the duration only because after
this movie dragged on and on and on, I had
to know the ending (which, of course, wasn't
worth the wait). David Dunn (Willis) survives
a horrible train wreck without a scratch.
He is then approached by Elijah Price (Jackson),
an odd fellow who owns a comic art gallery
and believes that comic book heroes actually
exist in real life. Dunn's miraculous survival
is the subject of Price's obsession, as
he strives to prove that Dunn is invincible.
And so he is.
The talents of all the actors are wasted
in this film. Bruce Willis spends the entire
film walking around dazed and confused.
Samuel Jackson has a slightly better part,
but the final crucial revelation about his
character doesn't have any punch to it.
Robin Wright Penn, a more than impressive,
award-winning actress ("She's So Lovely,"
"Forrest Gump"), is nothing more than filler
for a wife, and so is the talented young
Spencer Treat Clark ("Arlington Road," "Gladiator")
who plays Dunn's son.
For me, this is the first Bruce Willis film
that wasn't worth watching. The shame of
it is that the plot isn't bad. It coulda
been a contender.
–J.D-P
Note: All
film images are © and property of their
respective studios.
|
|
|
|
|
|