| “Ocean's of the Carribean III”
Film Review by Julia Dudnik-Stern
It seemed
fitting to review these third installments
together, as the verdict is essentially the
same. Yes, a terrible wrong needs undoing,
so both gangs are together again, and everyone
is still terribly good-looking. But the shtick
is beginning to get old.
In ”World’s End,” Will
(Bloom), Elizabeth (Knightley), and Capt.
Barbossa (Rush) embark on a voyage to save
Capt. Jack from a loopy demise. The East
India Trading Company controls Davy Jones
and his crew of crustacean monsters, conveniently
providing a bad guy.
 |
1. Geoffrey
Rush and Orlando Bloom.
2. Keira Knightley and Johnny Depp.
Images courtesy of and copyright
Disney. |
|
Unlike the first two movies, the plot
is contrived and predictable, if not boring.
The writing has lost much of its earlier
charm. The art direction and cinematography
remains breathtakingly beautiful, but not
quite as wittily delightful as, for example,
the scene of a dueling trio on a rolling
wheel in “Dead Man’s Chest.”
Johnny Depp continues to do all the heavy
lifting. Capably supported by Geoffrey Rush
and less-known members of the cast, Depp’s
continued hilarity is sharply contrasted
with the unfortunate ineptitude of both
Bloom and Knightley. Bloom’s character
has been relegated to teenage brooding and
titilating over-forty women with glimpses
of his buff young flesh. In contrast, Knightley’s
Elizabeth has somehow risen to a much more
important character than one would have
expected.
The usually charming Knightley is painfully
set up to play a role only the likes of
Sigourney Weaver and Geena Davis can get
away with: Super-women who appear believable
when kicking ass. Think “Alien”
or the closer-themed “Cutthroat Island.”
In “World’s End,” Knightley’s
diminutive height and weight, high-pitch
voice and the ridiculously fashionable,
Orient-inspired wardrobe make her look idiotic
wielding a sword or giving motivational
talks to a ragtag group of seafaring criminals.
On the whole, “Ocean’s Thirteen”
is a better film, if a more pretentious
one at that. It has a decent plot premise,
a believable set of characters, and dialogue
vaguely reminiscent of its two predecessors.
It is also infinitely better for not featuring
the female afterthoughts of the first and
second films.
Danny Ocean (Clooney) and his all-star
gang want payback after casino magnate Willy
Bank (Pacino) cheats Everybody Loves Reuben
(Gould) into a hospital bed. The plan is,
of course, to ruin Bank financially, and
to add insult to injury by depriving his
new hotel of a coveted award.
 |
1. Brad Pitt.
2. Ellen Barkin and Al Pacino.
Images courtesy of and copyright
Warner Bros. |
|
While we don’t exactly expect realism,
we want to see a bunch of cool guys
pull off a great heist in the style of
old Vegas. Alas, the cool guys are sporting
salon tans and overstyled clothes, the
heist ranges from boring to ridiculous,
and the Vegas illusion is shattered by
repetitive footage of the Bellagio’s
fountains.
“Thirteen” also fails the
CSI test—or rather, the same test
that CSI fails every week—by appealing
to the lowest common denominator. Just
like you can’t “enhance” video
footage by blowing it up some 2,000 percent,
you cannot “hack” into and “FBI
upload” on someone’s computer
and “redraw” a dozen
mugshots in a couple of minutes. Not
even if you had Photoshop. Not even
a little.
Somewhere between the first and third “Ocean’s,”
caricatures crept into the script. Pitt
is still semi-cool and Damon’s
existential crisis amuses, but Clooney
hasn’t
shaken the cloud of smug since South Park
pointed it out. Particularly caricaturesque
are the film’s villains: The
superbly clad, unnaturally thin ice
dame Ellen Barkin, who is implausibly
sharp and stupid at the same time,
and her boss the hotel mogul, played
by Al Pacino who’s reaching
the Nicholson zone—you know, the
place where you roll your eyes, growl
a little, and everyone is supposed to
be really, really scared.
Both “World’s End” and
“Thirteen” bank on your being
so in love with their characters that you
overlook the obvious conceptual and execution
flaws of each production. Unfortunately,
there is only one lovable character left
in the bunch. See you later, Capt. Jack.
|