|
Interview by Adriana
de Barros and Nuno Martins
| PART
3: Flash
technology is popular. Adobe confirmed
it with buying Macromedia. We see
web studios, Group94
and HiReS!,
dedicating a big percentage of projects
in Flash. Are Flash sites just a trend
and overall useless? Or do you consider
there is room for Flash as there is
with CSS, and yes, there are well-constructed
sites with usability?
|
Eric
Jordan:
Flash sites are in no way a trend. Humans
are sensory organisms. We need interaction,
we need emotional response, we need things
to move us. Flash is just the beginning
of all this. Flash is the best way to provoke
an emotional response, because it involves
more of the human senses than just a static
image or text can provide. I can promise
you that you will have a stronger emotional
reaction to a product advertisement with
sound and motion than you will to a static
one. At this point in time, there is definitely
room for Flash AND CSS AND properly constructed
websites that take usability into account.
As with all progression, it is going to
take time for this technology to develop,
and for people to feel comfortable with
it. I think, as we move forward, people
will grow and learn the technology faster
and faster, and hopefully 300 years in the
future we will have moved past assuming
that our audience is not smart enough to
use a certain function, or find a certain
button, or understand how an interface works.
This is when the gloves truly come off,
and I see humans doing some amazing things
with technology. But for the meantime I
think we must settle with our own ineptitude.
Jakob
Nielsen:
I am sad to say that I continue to see
relatively little good use of Flash. This
is particularly annoying to me because I
did a project to study people using Flash
to derive the guidelines for good Flash
usability. So I know that it's possible
to build good user interfaces in Flash.
There is definitely room for Flash for applications
that are highly interactive or where animation
inherently communicates something better.
The problem is just that very few sites
use Flash for these purposes. Most Flash
is still just flashy stuff that annoys users
instead of helping them.
[ top
]
Lynda
Weinman:
No Flash sites are not just a trend,
and Adobe is putting a huge effort into
insuring a solid future. A lot of the limitations
of Flash are being resolved, and the medium
is becoming just as flexible, usable and
accessible as HTML or CSS. Flash can be
misused and abused in the hands of the unskilled,
but with skills Flash can provide a much
more rich and usable experience. Not all
sites are appropriate for Flash, but many
sites wouldn’t work without it. It’s
another tool – one to pull out when
you wish to develop a rich experience.
Matt
Mullenweg:
I think Flash works best when it is
used only when absolutely needed for
a particularly rich interaction, rather
than just for the sake of being
flashy. Some good examples that come to
mind are Sphere,
Measure
Map, and YouTube
for tasteful and useful Flash.
Nick
Finck:
First, I don't think Adobe bought Macromedia
for Flash alone, that's a misunderstanding
of the complexity of that purchase. I wouldn't
say any work is useless. I think there is
room for any technology so long as the user
needs, business needs, and technical needs
are clearly understood. Flash tends to lean
towards the business needs with little regard
for the technology (ever tried to load a
Flash site on a Nokia 6683?) or the user
(ever try to navigate a flash application
via a screen reader blindfolded?) at times.
Todd
Purgason:
This is an absurd question really we
are doing major interactive applications
in Flash and video based solutions that
are only possible with Flash. CSS is great
for some things and frankly sucks for other
things. The same can be said for Flash but
to call it a trend is really funny as Flash
has been around longer than CSS. Trust me
I started hand coding in 1995 and worked
with the design and coding side as HTML
developed as well as Flash.
Sodaplay:
Flash can be a great tool where it is
compatible with the requirements of a brief;
we’ve used it before and are sure
to use it again.
[ top
]
WeWorkForThem:
You have to look at the audience. HiReS
does sites that are for entertainment, so
if they function in that area (and they
do!), they have served their purpose. Flash
can work in areas such as that. Using Flash
for a content driven site would give me
a headache trying to solve how it would
work, but it is possible. I am sure if you
had the right people on the job they could
do a wonderful execution. It’s all
how you use the tool and Flash seems to
be more than a tool sometimes. I personally
do not like Flash sites most of the time
if I am trying to use it for informational
purposes. It normally is slower and hard
to grab info from.
|